Consolidated democracies or not a comparative

Indeed some will contend that Wells goes too far, but this book, it must be remembered was part of the war effort. When it was written, Wells had recently retired from the position of Minister of Allied Propaganda, but that official retirement did not stop him continuing that effort.

Consolidated democracies or not a comparative

Additional Information Abstract The citizens of wealthy, established democracies are less satisfied with their governments than they have been at any time since opinion polling began.

Account Options

Most scholars have interpreted this as a sign of dissatisfaction with particular governments rather than with the political system as a whole. Drawing on recent public opinion data, we suggest that this optimistic interpretation is no longer plausible.

Across a wide sample of countries in North America and Western Europe, citizens of mature democracies have become markedly less satisfied with their form of government and surprisingly open to nondemocratic alternatives.

A serious democratic disconnect has emerged. If it widens even further, it may begin to challenge the stability of seemingly consolidated democracies.

If you would like to authenticate using a different subscribed institution that supports Shibboleth authentication or have your own login and password to Project MUSE, click 'Authenticate'.

Other Subject Areas

You are not currently authenticated. View freely available titles:About Polity.

Consolidated democracies or not a comparative

The Polity IV Project continues the Polity research tradition of coding authority characteristics of states in the world system for purposes of comparative, quantitative analysis. In political science, a wave of democracy refers to a major surge of democracy in history. The term "Third Wave of Democracy" was first coined by Samuel P.

Huntington, a political scientist at Harvard University in his article published in the Journal of Democracy and further expounded in his book The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late .

7. As compared to consolidated democracies and authoritarian regimes, transitional democracies are characterized by A. fewer legal protections that in either consolidated democracies or . 1 Revisiting new party success: a comparative analysis of young and consolidated democracies Mihail Chiru, Lucian Blaga University Sibiu Marina Popescu, Central European University Budapest.

[BINGSNIPMIX-3

Although democratic consolidation can be the endpoint of democratization, Schmitter and Karl echoes this view and further stresses that consolidated democracies will not be able, nor should be expected, Comparative Political Studies (): 5– a. more legal protection than consolidated democracies but less than in authoritarian regimes b.

more legal protection for economic and social rights but less for political rights c. more protection for civil liberties than either consolidated democracies or .

The Sources of Democratic Consolidation